Welcome to the Cheeky Weekly blog!


Welcome to the Cheeky Weekly blog!
Cheeky Weekly ™ REBELLION PUBLISHING LTD, COPYRIGHT ©  REBELLION PUBLISHING LTD, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED was a British children's comic with cover dates spanning 22 October 1977 to 02 February 1980.

Quick links...
Basic Stats
Cheeky Weekly Index Updated 28 August 2017
Cheeky Weekly Artist Index Updated 28 August 2017
Features by Number of Appearances
Issue Summaries posted to date
Major Characters from the Cheeky pages
Features Ordered by Date of Commencement

*** ALL IMAGES COPYRIGHT ©  REBELLION PUBLISHING LTD, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Used with permission. ***
*** CHEEKY WEEKLY, KRAZY, WHOOPEE and WHIZZER AND CHIPS ARE ™ REBELLION PUBLISHING LTD, COPYRIGHT ©  REBELLION PUBLISHING LTD, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ***

The images posted on this blog can be enlarged by clicking on them.  Depending on your browser, you may have to click again on the enlarged image to see it in full size.
Thanks for reading the blog.

Thursday, 28 April 2016

Whizzer and Chips - The Cheeky Raids part 16

New readers start here... After Cheeky Weekly folded and was incorporated into Whoopee as of February 1980 six strips that had originated in the toothy funster's title survived the merge and continued to appear in the amalgamated comic. Whoopee itself foundered in March 1985 and was merged into Whizzer and Chips. Three of the surviving Cheeky Weekly strips successfully negotiated this second merge and went on to appear in the newly combined publication, rather inelegantly titled 'Whizzer and Chips now including Whoopee'. The survivors were Mustapha Million, Calculator Kid and (appearing only twice ) Stage School. Cheeky continued to appear, but as a member of The Krazy Gang, who had moved into W&C when Krazy, the comic in which the Gang originated, expired in April 1978.

Whizzer and Chips had a long tradition of sending characters from the Chips section into Whizzer and vice versa. These cross-comic forays were known as 'raids'. In this series of posts I'm chronicling the raids involving the ex-Cheeky Weekly characters who made the transition into Whizzer and Chips, all of whom were allocated to the Chips section. For the purposes of this series, although this particular manifestation of the toothy funster didn't directly descend from Cheeky Weekly, I'm including Cheeky's Krazy Gang appearances as those of an 'ex-Cheeky Weekly character'.


A week after the raid documented here, ex-Cheeky Weekly characters were again involved in raiding activities. Mustapha Million suffered two indignities, the first being the non-appearance of the first of a series of new MM stories, which had been trailed in the 04 January 1986 issue - hence the caption at the top of the page. As well as this disappointment, our wealthy chum was unwitting host to an intruder - can you spot the interloper? Scroll down for the answer.

Whizzer and Chips 25 January 1986
Art: Joe Joe McCaffrey









That rubbery rascal Odd-Ball was the nefarious gate-crasher. However, just a few pages later the smug alien sphere was targeted by a plucky ex-Cheeky chum of ours - can you spot the perpetrator of this swift retaliatory raid? The answer can be found below.



Whizzer and Chips 25 January 1986
Art: Terry Bave










This brings to 13 the number of raids carried out on ex-Cheeky Weekly stars, while our pals had infiltrated the pages of Whizzer 8 times. More raiding fun soon!


Whizzer and Chips Cover Date Raider Raided
06 April 1985Mustapha MillionSuper Steve
04 May 1985Bloggs (Store Wars)Mustapha Million
11 May 1985JokerThe Krazy Gang (Cheeky)
18 May 1985Calculator Kid & CalcOdd-Ball
01 June 1985
Animalad
Mustapha Million
The Krazy Gang (Cheeky)
Boy Boss
08 June 1985Odd-BallCalculator Kid
06 July 1985Toy BoyCalculator Kid
13 July 1985Pa BumpkinThe Krazy Gang (Cheeky)
27 July 1985JokerMustapha Million
24 August 1985CheekySid's Snake
14 September 1985
Odd-Ball
Calculator Kid
Calculator Kid
Store Wars
05 October 1985Mustapha MillionAnimalad
19 October 1985Odd-BallMustapha Million
23 November 1985
Sweeny Toddler
Sweeny Toddler
Sweeny Toddler
Calculator Kid
The Krazy Gang (Cheeky)
Mustapha Million
18 January 1986Mustapha MillionSuper Steve
25 January 1986
Odd-Ball
Cheeky
Mustapha Million
Odd-Ball

Thursday, 21 April 2016

The Ads - Sweets (part 1)

In the same way that comic readers of the 1970s were familiar with the big names in comic publishing (IPC, DC Thomson, Marvel, DC), so were the consumers of sweets (very often overlapping in the Venn diagram of newsagent patrons) aware of the manufacturers of their favourite treats. Rowntrees, Trebor, Mackintosh, Cadbury, Mars – mention of these names would bring on a craving for something sweet and either chewy, crunchy, chocolatey, minty or else fruity and boiled (or possibly, in the case of those with generous pocket-money allowances, a combination of all the above).


There was yet another titan of the enamel-eroders; Bassett's. Bassett's were probably most associated with their iconic Jelly Babies and Liquorice Allsorts, but the company's ads in Cheeky Weekly focused on a range of pre-packaged confectionery clearly aimed at the younger end of the sweet-buying market. Running during the latter half of 1978 for a total of 5 times, the adverts (all identical) alerted readers to a promotion whereby 12 empty bags from the range could be exchanged for a book featuring Paddington Bear. The marmalade-loving ursine immigrant had been appearing in children's books since 1958, but in 1975 he made the leap to the small screen in a high-profile animated series, and Bassett's no doubt hoped to capitalise on the resurgent interest in the character. It seems those who survived the sugary onslaught necessary to accumulate the requisite 12 depleted packs were able to specify which Paddington book they required from a selection of 8. 11 tomes relating the misadventures of the furry, hat-sporting Peruvian had been published by this time, but maybe the books on offer were specially produced for the purposes of the promotion – despite an exhaustive search of the internet (lasting almost 3 minutes) I've been unable to source any further information regarding this ad campaign, so we'll probably never know.

Advertiser Bassett's
Issue Date Page Page Type Advertiser Subject
22-Jul-197822NormalBassett's
05-Aug-19789NormalBassett's
09-Sep-197813NormalBassett's
14-Oct-197811NormalBassett's
18-Nov-19788NormalBassett's


Similarly-named sweet manufacturer Barratt ran a short promotion in September 1979 relating to their Oran-gee-tang nougat bar. Were you one of those kids who pronounced it 'nugget', or did you use the posher-sounding 'noogah'. I must confess I fell into the latter category. Like Basset's, Barratt chose to anthropomorphise their campaign, but in this case it was an unknown primate of their own devising, looking more like a gorilla than the orangutan it was presumably supposed to resemble, who was chosen to head up the promotion. Unlike Bassett's, Barratt chose to place full-page, colour ads, although the Barratt campaign was much shorter.

Barratt required of their respondents less exposure to tooth-rotting materials than their rival, as just two wrappers from the rainforest-inhabitant-referencing, filling-loosening comestible would facilitate entry into a competition to win a 'customised' bike. Again the ad is somewhat lacking in detail, giving no indication as to the nature of said customisations. Possibly a giant, flashing fibreglass Oran-gee-tang bar attached to the handlebars – once more the internet fails to furnish enlightenment.

Advertiser Barratt
Issue Date Page Page Type Advertiser Subject
15-Sep-197925NormalBarrattOran-gee-tang
22-Sep-197925NormalBarrattOran-gee-tang

Thursday, 14 April 2016

Chipping away at the Whizz-kids



If you've been following my series of posts entitled Whizzer and Chips - The Cheeky Raids, you'll be aware that Whizzer and Chips was from the outset designed to have the appearance of two comics in one. The editor encouraged a friendly rivalry between those readers who favoured the contents of Chips and those whose tastes tended toward the strips comprising Whizzer. Readers were invited to separate the Chips section from Whizzer, though I doubt many who read it actually went to the trouble of extricating one 'comic' from the other. But the strategy of setting Whizz-kid against Chip-ite, fuelled on the letters pages of the respective 'titles' by Sid (Whizz-kid leader) and Shiner (Chips' supremo), was not without its risks. If readers took things a bit too literally it could result in them ripping out and discarding unread whichever section they found offensive. If their weekly W&C was parentally funded, such action could result in a "Well, if you're going to throw half the comic away I won't buy it for you any more" scenario.

To combat this, a clever ruse was instigated early in the comic's run. In each issue, a character from the Whizzer section would appear somewhere within Chips, and vice-versa. Readers were encouraged to locate and obliterate the interloper from the rival section, but they would also be keen to find the character from the section they supported who was appearing within the pages of the 'rival comic'. Thus even the most resolute Chip-ite or fervent Whizz-Kid could be persuaded to peruse, and surreptitiously enjoy at least part of, the less-favoured portion of the publication, ostensibly to locate and cheer on their intrepid invader.

Whizzer and Chips dated 28 May 1988 makes it evident that the pitting of Chip-ite against Whizz-kid had another drawback.

Gauging the popularity of the individual strips was clearly vital to maintaining healthy circulation figures, but unlike today's interactive world, there was no easy way to garner feedback from those who made up the comic's audience. I was surprised when I read Terry Bave's autobiography to find the amount of audience research that Terry and his wife Shiela undertook before launching a new strip. I have no idea how common it was for those in the comic business to obtain feedback from school children in the way Terry describes, but I'm guessing it was not a regular occurrence. What was a common sight in comics of the time was the 'let us know which are your 3/5/10 favourite strips' coupons which readers were regularly invited to complete and post back the the editor. By the time of this issue it would appear that concern was beginning to arise in the office that readers may be allowing their devotion to one or other parts of the comic to colour their coupon responses. Thus for this issue Sid and Shiner adopted an uncharacteristically conciliatory tone, to try and encourage an honest appraisal from readers of the comic's most popular content.





 Fortunately, the accord displayed on Sid and Shiner's pages didn't extend to that week's strips...

Art: Terry Bave
The regular rivalry resumed in the following issue.

Wednesday, 6 April 2016

Dollars and Sense



From the very first of his strips, Mustapha Million's adventures were introduced by a caption fashioned to read Mustapha Mi££ion. In all the references I have made to this strip over the years I have chosen to type Million rather than the jokey construction used in the comic because;

  • Typing Mi££ion requires a bit more thinking about than the conventional spelling. Forcing my fingers to formulate the curious 'Shift and 3' configuration that will cause the iconic currency-denoting symbol to appear on screen slows my words-per-minute count which is already pretty poor due to my two-digit keyboard manipulation. Thus I choose to use the conventional spelling to save a bit of time.
  • While it looks ok in the comic, Mi££ion just looks very odd in whatever font blogger defaults to, causing it to look a bit like Miffion.

In the first episode we learned that Mustapha had inadvertently struck oil in his homeland as a result of over-enthusiastic hammering on a tent peg while setting up camp in the desert. Although his oleaginous wealth didn't originate in the UK, the use of pound signs in the Mustapha title frame was entirely appropriate because our moneyed mate was, for the duration of his comic adventures, living in good old Blighty and therefore his frequent distribution of large amounts of cash (no anti-money-laundering regulations to worry about in those days) was very likely mostly transacted in sterling.


Cheeky Weekly was of course home to another character whose title included a seven-figure allusion - 6 Million Dollar Gran. I always assumed Gran was based in the UK, but that Professor Potts' pioneering robotics research was funded by the US, thus giving rise to the title. Clearly I'm thinking far too deeply about this as '6 Million Dollar Gran' was just a play on the 6 Million Dollar Man TV series and I doubt whether the creator gave much thought as to why Gran was valued in a currency other than that of the UK. Nevertheless, the synthetic senior citizen's title caption read 6 Million Dollar Gran throughout her Cheeky Weekly career. However...

Someone made a bit of a slip-up when composing the cover of Cheeky Weekly dated 01 September 1979, as the banner at the top of the front page reads 'Bionic Action with 6 Mi££ion Dollar Gran - Inside!'. Apart from the fact that they used the wrong currency symbol, they also forgot to take account of the GBP/USD exchange rate. This online historical converter suggests that on 22 October 1977 (cover date of the first Cheeky Weekly and my presumed date of her dollar valuation) a more accurate description would have been Three Mi££ion, Three Hundred and Eighty-Eight Thousand and Fifteen Pounds and Ninety One Pence Gran.

Of course, setting aside the exchange rate issue, if they'd spelt it with the more appropriate dollar signs that would have made the title read '6 Mission Dollar Gran' which doesn't make sense.

Friday, 1 April 2016

A Funster-Filled Fool's Day

This April Fool's day finds the internet awash with the toothy funster - well, 2 blog posts, anyway. Coincidentally both posts are focusing on the 1978 edition of Cheeky Weekly which carried the fateful date on its front cover (seeing as the comic lasted for only 117 issues sadly there's not many April Fool editions to choose from!).

Here's Bruce's take on the issue, and here's the Great News analysis of the April foolery.